<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/rsstransform.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<title>eProductivity IdeaJam RSS Feed</title>
	<description>An RSS feed generated by eProductivity IdeaJam for All comments</description>
	<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf</link>
	
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Timestamp feature for Description field in Projects/Actions</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Kenneth Glade&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I have done this in my Notes using a custom button on the toolbar, using the formula: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; @Command([EditInsertText&#93;;@Text(@Now)) &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I just hit the button in any text entry field and get a time / date stamp. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I have another, just for the date, with the similar formula: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; @Command([EditInsertText&#93;;@Text(@Today)) &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/1E0340C60B19EFAF882576E100233979?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Ability to create New Project in Link to Existing Project view</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Kenneth Glade&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I really like this idea! It always causes me to stop for a moment, to decide if I already have a project defined so I can choose the correct item from the dropdown. Better in my opinion would be to have just a "...link to project" choice from which I could scan my existing projects and create a new one if I don't find one already created. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/A165AD6B836F090A07257514006A4E9A?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Ability to create New Project in Link to Existing Project view</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Keith Collyer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; If this was changed as the original proposal and Rainer suggest, then there would seem to be no need for "link to new project" in the drop-down - the only advantage of it being there would be it would save having to wait for the project box to populate. Even then, I have created duplicate projects because I forgot one already existed, so having the current list as a prompt would be very useful.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/A165AD6B836F090A07257514006A4E9A?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Ability to create New Project in Link to Existing Project view</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Jake Hawkes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I'm promoting this too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would make eProd fit into the common user experience, and would save me having to try and remember all the projects I've already created.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/A165AD6B836F090A07257514006A4E9A?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Sidebar panel: Add ability to perform actions on what's shown there</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ryan Heathers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Definitely. I know this is part of the development plan. More interactive ability on the widgets will be powerful.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/AF3E53FCD1A61064882576AC004E5576?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Mark All Day Events Complete</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Keith Collyer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; As In understand it, the philosophy behind the way calendar entries are treated in eProd is that they are completed by virtue of the fact that the time has passed. I know that it caused more than a few problems when it was possible to make calendar entries as completed.&lt;br /&gt;I still think it would be useful, but I suspect that to make it happen would require quite a bit of thinking on the part of the whoever is creating the requirements and the designers to make it entirely consistent.&lt;br /&gt;So I'm going to vote for, as a way of prompting this line of thought.&lt;br /&gt;See also my previous idea at { &lt;a href="http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/58B6CD54CBB95E8F072575E50048062E" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt; }&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/AA206539FC4F996A882576B8007723D6?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Ability to flag tasks/projects in future Today Views.</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Keith Collyer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Effectively a "Display in Today From..." date? I like it&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/792D026C56C1181E882576B1007AC49B?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Ability to flag tasks/projects in future Today Views.</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Fred Janssen&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Nice... Very Nice...&lt;br /&gt;White flag for tomorrow's Today view, Green flag for today's...&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/792D026C56C1181E882576B1007AC49B?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Build Project/Action Templates into eProductivity</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Betty Kumahor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Would love this! And should make sure to copy all the fields over including the notes section at the bottom of the form/document, as well as any attachments. We have a Lotus Notes product that does do this so (including linked documents) and it works really well.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/BE562E6D7DF0B2BB07257495008340EA?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Mark action as CANCELLED</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Kenneth Glade&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; What I have been doing is typing the date and "dropped" in the details section of the action, then marking it complete. &lt;br /&gt; If I wanted higher visibility, I'd put [dropped&#93; in the beginning of the action subject, or create a new context called "Dropped"&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/2F24A0FF6045F153882576A300792F68?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Mark action as CANCELLED</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ryan Heathers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Hmm, interesting idea. I'll give that a thumb's up vote.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/2F24A0FF6045F153882576A300792F68?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Add "whom" to "Waiting for"</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; John Cawrey&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; for me this would be a particularly important thing. I have many tasks where I am 'Waiting for' someone else. Usually its an action on one specific person, even though I may want to link several contacts to this action. I dont want all those linked contacts to have this action associated with them in the by entity view.&lt;br /&gt;Cant it be simply a need to add a 'Who' or 'Entity' option if the Context is 'Waiting For' and have this display in the entitity view. That is, on the action form have &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Action&lt;br /&gt;Context&lt;br /&gt;When&lt;br /&gt;*Who/Entity* [if Context=WaitingFor&#93;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Within the New Action form, there is no way to associate it with a person(entity) so even now its extra steps to save the action, then find it, then Link to....exisiting contact. And what if the contact doesnt exist yet??&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think this would merit more thinking, and so I vote it up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am new to eProductivity, so I am still learning the basics, please bear with me.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/0B766666E4E3C7EB07257482006498D9?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Option to use Quickr as reference db</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; John Palmer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; @Vaughan - just took a look and our admins have us set to "No" as a roaming user with no ability to change it. And trying to convince the admins to change ANYTHING . . . well . . . you know.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/55BE061DC49A5CD888257682004ABC23?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Option to use Quickr as reference db</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Vaughan Rivett&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; If you use your Personal Journal as your quick reference database (you have to replace the design), enable roaming profiles in your Lotus Domino person document, then it will replicate automatically to all of your machines.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/55BE061DC49A5CD888257682004ABC23?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Prompt to create Additional Next Actions when saving a project </title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Rainer Fuchs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I like this too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maybe I am deviating from the "purity" of GTD but in my experience many projects have several actions that can occur simultaneously and are not linearly dependent on each other.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Obviously, you can only execute one action at a time, but for example, if my project is to complete a presentation that requires input from a few coworkers and I can send off a couple of email messages to my colleagues and then begin to draft a presentation while waiting for their feedback, I'd rather see "email to Joe", "email to Jane", and "draft presentation" all as next actions on my list, rather then having to promote several actions to next action status in a very short span of time.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/95067976E4FAED4888257675000312D0?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Buttons and icons</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Keith Collyer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Just commenting to prod this one up the list as I can only vote once ;-)&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/206B3C9A05DC52CD0725749F00332436?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Option to use Quickr as reference db</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Fred Janssen&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Nice one...&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/55BE061DC49A5CD888257682004ABC23?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Webinar</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Michel Van der Poorten&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Do you record the webinar? If so, could you please post it online? I missed last week's due to an urgency. However, I'm still interested in its content. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; thanks for your help!&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/F0DD61727DF793AE07257558007AFD0B?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Prompt to create Additional Next Actions when saving a project </title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Keith Collyer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; If adhering to GtD, only the first should be a "Next Action", but this is an excellent idea.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/95067976E4FAED4888257675000312D0?opendocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Prompt to create Additional Next Actions when saving a project </title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ryan Heathers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Yes, I like your thinking. Definitely an improvement on my idea.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.eproductivity.com/ICA/eProductivityIJDB.nsf/0/95067976E4FAED4888257675000312D0?opendocument</link>
	</item>
</channel></rss>
